My Blog Search

All parcels are

forakin at gmail dot com

Comment notice:

You are free to leave comments on my blogs as long as they are polite, reasoned and within the context of what I have written.

I will NOT entertain insults, abuse or expletives; your strength of emotion should be expressed without resorting to uncouth expression.

Since, it is my blog, I reserve the right to accept, review, edit without losing the context or delete the comment - if it does not meet standards of decent and polite discourse.

Finally, your comments cannot be anonymous, please give a name when leaving a comment.

Thanks for reading my blog and leaving a comment.

My Popular Tags

                                                           

My Mini Search

 

My Moon Days

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1
23
4
5
6
7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

My Flickr Badge

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from akinnld. Make your own badge here.

Sitting here in limbo

posted Saturday, 21 April 2007

After death, then what?

I am no expert in paedo-theology, the religiosity of the unborn or the spirituality of the foetus, but a document released by the Vatican International Theological Commission brings this topic into new focus.

Obviously, there are dogmatic differences between Christian denominations on the matter of infant baptism and the issues of salvation before or after death, the posthumous expectations do matter a lot to those still living.

In contemporary terms, we view limbo as a place of undecided and unresolved situations, Catholic Theology has viewed it as a place not in heaven and definitely not in hell, but an almost there place in view of salvation but not entering into the presence of the Almighty.

The doctrine of the dead child

The Catholics have also agonised about the spiritual status of the aborted unborn child or children who die before they are baptised - this has varied from outright damnation to an almost heaven place.

The study now aims to redefine limbo in terms of the more comfortable green room but never getting to meet the host, though there is hope.

Suffer the children

Whilst I would not deign to challenge the authority of the Pope, I would recall that his boss Jesus Christ made such an issue of asking children to His company and blessing them whilst admonishing the learned adults that flocked Him that except they, the adults became like children they would not enter the Kingdom of God.

Other preachers listeners to repent and be baptised - whilst this is no exegesis of religious dogma, a few points are clear from these issues - children exhibit innocence and dependencies of trust that are necessary to establish a strong relationship with God and baptism accompanies repentance, indicating the person who is baptised be accountable, that person cannot be an infant.

Jesus was never ambiguous about children belonging in the presence of God and this is at variance with extant Catholic teaching.

Hope of salvation

However, in what is looking like trying to bolster the social views against abortion and committing a child to a religious association they do not understand; parents in those unfortunate circumstances of worrying about the loss or the possible loss of a child now have serious indulgence-like obligations to distress the child with a baptism service lest they have to regret leaving the child in a state of near damnation but with one eye of God on the child.

What I would hate to happen is a new doctrine that emerges on the conclusions of this one suggesting that the child can be prayed out of limbo into the arms of God through the much reviled indulgences of old, thus, playing on the hopes of the vulnerable parents.

Let me say we have the makings of a new Protestant reformation brewing whilst I am sitting here in limbo.

tags:                  

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. Confused left...
Monday, 9 July 2007 8:34 am

God is perfect and only makes laws that are implausible...if this law does not make sense and is implausible(no surprise considering it was made up by man) then obviously it can't be from God...conclusion?

This is gibberrish...I think all wo/men are born innocent and go to heaven. Only from one's actions after becoming consciously able should we be able to be judged for our mistakes?

Why should an innocent have to pay for Adam/Eve's sin if Jesus apparently is claimed to have die for all sins?? totally makes no sense to me...How can man just change rules to fit one's comfort and still claim these same rules to be from God?? I am dumbfounded...


Tag Related Posts

Our Lady of Fátima

Friday, 22 August 2008
My visit to Fátima, the place of pilgrimage of the sanctuary and shrine of Our Lady of Fátima.

Does Ichabod now live at the Vatican?

Thursday, 7 June 2007
A presumably mentally ill man vaults a barricade and latches himself to the Popemobile probably expecting a miracle cure - he is now ensconced in a mental health hospital. So much for power in the established church.

Pope in Brazil gives no abortions message

Thursday, 10 May 2007
The Pope takes a strident anti-abortion message to Brazil - Is there some coded message of peace and grace in this stance?

Sitting here in limbo

Saturday, 21 April 2007
The Catholics redefine limbo regarding children but it has more far-reaching consequences for infant baptism, children in Christianity and judgement.

Whose apology is it anyway?

Sunday, 17 September 2006
When the Pope does apologise, what would constitute an acceptable apology and who judges it as such?

A new Jihad for the streets of Islam

Saturday, 16 September 2006
The furore over the Pope's speech last Tuesday indicates Islamic scholarship should become the forefront of the supposed clash of civilisations. The Pope's exhortation to reason regardless of religious persuasion should dominate the agenda.